| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 22:55:35 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI / scan: Drop acpi_bus_add() and use acpi_bus_scan() instead (was: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / scan: Fold acpi_bus_scan() into acpi_bus_add())
On Friday, January 18, 2013 09:47:21 AM Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:35 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> >
> > The only difference between acpi_bus_scan() into acpi_bus_add() is
> > the invocation of acpi_update_all_gpes() in the latter which in fact
> > is unnecessary, because acpi_update_all_gpes() has already been
> > called by acpi_scan_init() and the way it is implemented causes the
> > next invocations of it to do nothing.
> >
> > For this reason, drop the acpi_update_all_gpes() call from
> > acpi_bus_add() and fold acpi_bus_scan() into it. Additionally,
> > rename acpi_bus_scan_fixed() to acpi_bus_add_fixed(), because
> > acpi_bus_scan() is not present any more, and rearrange the code
> > in acpi_scan_init() slightly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/scan.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > @@ -1584,24 +1584,6 @@ static acpi_status acpi_bus_device_attac
> > return status;
> > }
> >
> > -static int acpi_bus_scan(acpi_handle handle)
> > -{
> > - void *device = NULL;
> > -
> > - if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_bus_check_add(handle, 0, NULL, &device)))
> > - acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_ANY, handle, ACPI_UINT32_MAX,
> > - acpi_bus_check_add, NULL, NULL, &device);
> > -
> > - if (!device)
> > - return -ENODEV;
> > -
> > - if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_bus_device_attach(handle, 0, NULL, NULL)))
> > - acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_ANY, handle, ACPI_UINT32_MAX,
> > - acpi_bus_device_attach, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> > -
> > - return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > /**
> > * acpi_bus_add - Add ACPI device node objects in a given namespace scope.
> > * @handle: Root of the namespace scope to scan.
> > @@ -1616,13 +1598,19 @@ static int acpi_bus_scan(acpi_handle han
> > */
> > int acpi_bus_add(acpi_handle handle)
>
> looks like scan is good name.
>
> scan = add + attach better than
> add = add + attach?
Well, I thought "add = create + attach". :-)
Anyway, scan works for me too.
Thanks,
Rafael
---
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: ACPI / scan: Drop acpi_bus_add() and use acpi_bus_scan() instead
The only difference between acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_add() is the
invocation of acpi_update_all_gpes() in the latter which in fact is
unnecessary, because acpi_update_all_gpes() has already been called
by acpi_scan_init() and the way it is implemented guarantees the next
invocations of it to do nothing.
For this reason, drop acpi_bus_add() and make all its callers use
acpi_bus_scan() directly instead of it. Additionally, rearrange the
code in acpi_scan_init() slightly to improve the visibility of the
acpi_update_all_gpes() call in there.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c | 2 -
drivers/acpi/container.c | 2 -
drivers/acpi/dock.c | 2 -
drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c | 2 -
drivers/acpi/scan.c | 54 +++++++++++++++----------------------
drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c | 4 +-
drivers/pci/hotplug/sgi_hotplug.c | 4 +-
include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 2 -
8 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -1584,26 +1584,8 @@ static acpi_status acpi_bus_device_attac
return status;
}
-static int acpi_bus_scan(acpi_handle handle)
-{
- void *device = NULL;
-
- if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_bus_check_add(handle, 0, NULL, &device)))
- acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_ANY, handle, ACPI_UINT32_MAX,
- acpi_bus_check_add, NULL, NULL, &device);
-
- if (!device)
- return -ENODEV;
-
- if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_bus_device_attach(handle, 0, NULL, NULL)))
- acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_ANY, handle, ACPI_UINT32_MAX,
- acpi_bus_device_attach, NULL, NULL, NULL);
-
- return 0;
-}
-
/**
- * acpi_bus_add - Add ACPI device node objects in a given namespace scope.
+ * acpi_bus_scan - Add ACPI device node objects in a given namespace scope.
* @handle: Root of the namespace scope to scan.
*
* Scan a given ACPI tree (probably recently hot-plugged) and create and add
@@ -1614,18 +1596,24 @@ static int acpi_bus_scan(acpi_handle han
* in the table trunk from which the kernel could create a device and add an
* appropriate driver.
*/
-int acpi_bus_add(acpi_handle handle)
+int acpi_bus_scan(acpi_handle handle)
{
- int err;
+ void *device = NULL;
+
+ if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_bus_check_add(handle, 0, NULL, &device)))
+ acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_ANY, handle, ACPI_UINT32_MAX,
+ acpi_bus_check_add, NULL, NULL, &device);
+
+ if (!device)
+ return -ENODEV;
- err = acpi_bus_scan(handle);
- if (err)
- return err;
+ if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_bus_device_attach(handle, 0, NULL, NULL)))
+ acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_ANY, handle, ACPI_UINT32_MAX,
+ acpi_bus_device_attach, NULL, NULL, NULL);
- acpi_update_all_gpes();
return 0;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_bus_add);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_bus_scan);
static acpi_status acpi_bus_device_detach(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl_not_used,
void *not_used, void **ret_not_used)
@@ -1714,13 +1702,15 @@ int __init acpi_scan_init(void)
return result;
result = acpi_bus_get_device(ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT, &acpi_root);
- if (!result)
- result = acpi_bus_scan_fixed();
-
if (result)
+ return result;
+
+ result = acpi_bus_scan_fixed();
+ if (result) {
acpi_device_unregister(acpi_root);
- else
- acpi_update_all_gpes();
+ return result;
+ }
- return result;
+ acpi_update_all_gpes();
+ return 0;
}
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ acpi_memory_get_device(acpi_handle handl
* Now add the notified device. This creates the acpi_device
* and invokes .add function
*/
- result = acpi_bus_add(handle);
+ result = acpi_bus_scan(handle);
if (result) {
acpi_handle_warn(handle, "Cannot add acpi bus\n");
return -EINVAL;
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/container.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/container.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/container.c
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static void container_notify_cb(acpi_han
if (!ACPI_FAILURE(status) || device)
break;
- result = acpi_bus_add(handle);
+ result = acpi_bus_scan(handle);
if (result) {
acpi_handle_warn(handle, "Failed to add container\n");
break;
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/dock.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/dock.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/dock.c
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ static struct acpi_device * dock_create_
* no device created for this object,
* so we should create one.
*/
- ret = acpi_bus_add(handle);
+ ret = acpi_bus_scan(handle);
if (ret)
pr_debug("error adding bus, %x\n", -ret);
Index: linux-pm/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
@@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ static int acpiphp_bus_add(struct acpiph
dbg("acpi_bus_trim return %x\n", ret_val);
}
- ret_val = acpi_bus_add(func->handle);
+ ret_val = acpi_bus_scan(func->handle);
if (!ret_val)
ret_val = acpi_bus_get_device(func->handle, &device);
@@ -1129,7 +1129,7 @@ static void handle_bridge_insertion(acpi
return;
}
- if (acpi_bus_add(handle)) {
+ if (acpi_bus_scan(handle)) {
err("cannot add bridge to acpi list\n");
return;
}
Index: linux-pm/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
+++ linux-pm/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
@@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ static inline int acpi_bus_generate_proc
#endif
int acpi_bus_register_driver(struct acpi_driver *driver);
void acpi_bus_unregister_driver(struct acpi_driver *driver);
-int acpi_bus_add(acpi_handle handle);
+int acpi_bus_scan(acpi_handle handle);
void acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(void *context);
int acpi_bus_trim(struct acpi_device *start);
acpi_status acpi_bus_get_ejd(acpi_handle handle, acpi_handle * ejd);
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
@@ -699,7 +699,7 @@ static void acpi_processor_hotplug_notif
if (!acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device))
break;
- result = acpi_bus_add(handle);
+ result = acpi_bus_scan(handle);
if (result) {
acpi_handle_err(handle, "Unable to add the device\n");
break;
Index: linux-pm/drivers/pci/hotplug/sgi_hotplug.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/pci/hotplug/sgi_hotplug.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/pci/hotplug/sgi_hotplug.c
@@ -447,9 +447,9 @@ static int enable_slot(struct hotplug_sl
if (ACPI_SUCCESS(ret) &&
(adr>>16) == (slot->device_num + 1)) {
- ret = acpi_bus_add(chandle);
+ ret = acpi_bus_scan(chandle);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(ret)) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "%s: acpi_bus_add "
+ printk(KERN_ERR "%s: acpi_bus_scan "
"failed (0x%x) for slot %d "
"func %d\n", __func__,
ret, (int)(adr>>16),
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists