linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 48/76] ARC: Module support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:26:36 +0530
From:	Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:	<linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 48/76] ARC: Module support

On Friday 18 January 2013 08:20 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 18 January 2013, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>
>> +int module_frob_arch_sections(Elf_Ehdr *hdr, Elf_Shdr *sechdrs,
>> +			      char *secstr, struct module *mod)
>> +{
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void module_arch_cleanup(struct module *mod)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +
>> +int module_finalize(const Elf32_Ehdr *hdr, const Elf_Shdr *sechdrs,
>> +		    struct module *mod)
>> +{
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
> These three empty functions are already defined __weak in kernel/module.c
> so you can simply omit them here.
>
> 	Arnd

Actually a subsequent patch to do dwarf unwinding out of modules has valid code in
those. But yes I can take them out from this patch and introduce in the the one
which really needs it.

Thx,
-Vineet
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/