linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 (acpi)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 19 Jan 2013 15:01:09 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	sedat.dilek@...il.com
Cc:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 (acpi)

On Saturday, January 19, 2013 02:50:17 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > On Friday, January 18, 2013 05:42:20 PM Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> On 01/17/13 20:37, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > Changes since 20130117:
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> on x86_64:
> >>
> >>   CC      drivers/acpi/device_pm.o
> >> drivers/acpi/device_pm.c:778:5: error: redefinition of 'acpi_dev_suspend_late'
> >> In file included from include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h:29:0,
> >>                  from drivers/acpi/device_pm.c:33:
> >> include/linux/acpi.h:526:19: note: previous definition of 'acpi_dev_suspend_late' was here
> >> drivers/acpi/device_pm.c:810:5: error: redefinition of 'acpi_dev_resume_early'
> >> In file included from include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h:29:0,
> >>                  from drivers/acpi/device_pm.c:33:
> >> include/linux/acpi.h:527:19: note: previous definition of 'acpi_dev_resume_early' was here
> >> drivers/acpi/device_pm.c:828:5: error: redefinition of 'acpi_subsys_prepare'
> >> In file included from include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h:29:0,
> >>                  from drivers/acpi/device_pm.c:33:
> >> include/linux/acpi.h:528:19: note: previous definition of 'acpi_subsys_prepare' was here
> >> drivers/acpi/device_pm.c:846:5: error: redefinition of 'acpi_subsys_suspend_late'
> >> In file included from include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h:29:0,
> >>                  from drivers/acpi/device_pm.c:33:
> >> include/linux/acpi.h:529:19: note: previous definition of 'acpi_subsys_suspend_late' was here
> >> drivers/acpi/device_pm.c:861:5: error: redefinition of 'acpi_subsys_resume_early'
> >> In file included from include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h:29:0,
> >>                  from drivers/acpi/device_pm.c:33:
> >> include/linux/acpi.h:530:19: note: previous definition of 'acpi_subsys_resume_early' was here
> >> make[3]: *** [drivers/acpi/device_pm.o] Error 1
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Full randconfig file is attached.
> >
> > Thanks, I'll take it for inclusion into the build testing framework.
> >
> > The appended patch fixes the problem for me.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rafael
> >
> >
> > ---
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> > Subject: ACPI / PM: Fix build for unusual combination of Kconfig options
> >
> > CONFIG_PM_SLEEP may be set even if CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP is unset,
> > although that is unusual.  For this reason, make the headers of
> > functions built for both CONFIG_ACPI and CONFIG_PM_SLEEP set
> > simultaneously depend on that combination of Kconfig options
> > instead of CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP.
> >
> > This fixes a build problem reported by Randy Dunlap.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/acpi.h |    2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-pm/include/linux/acpi.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/acpi.h
> > +++ linux-pm/include/linux/acpi.h
> 
> Can you tell me how do you create such a patch with "Index:" line?
> 
> linux-pm.orig as a reference is not very meaninful :-).
> 
> If this is against Linux-Next (next-20130118) I would like to see:
> --- next-20130118.orig/path/to/file
> +++ next-20130118/path/to/file
> 
> I had used 'git format-patch' with '--subject-prefix="PATCH
> next-20130118"' option in such a case.
> Just as a hint by not telling you how you should do your job.
> 
> /me is still a Git n00b!

Well, I use quilt to generate patches. :-)

This particular one was generated with "quilt refresh --diffstat", I'm not
sure how to get the same result using git, sorry.

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/