| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 16:47:16 +0100
From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
To: Ilya Zykov <ilya@...x.ru>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: Correct tty buffer flush.
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Ilya Zykov <ilya@...x.ru> wrote:
>> The root of problem is carelessly zeroing pointer(in function __tty_buffer_flush()),
>> when another thread can use it. It can be cause of "NULL pointer dereference".
>> Main idea of the patch, this is never free last (struct tty_buffer) in the active buffer.
>> Only flush the data for ldisc(buf->head->read = buf->head->commit).
>> At that moment driver can collect(write) data in buffer without conflict.
>> It is repeat behavior of flush_to_ldisc(), only without feeding data to ldisc.
>>
>> Also revert:
>> commit c56a00a165712fd73081f40044b1e64407bb1875
>> tty: hold lock across tty buffer finding and buffer filling
>> In order to delete the unneeded locks any more.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ilya Zykov <ilya@...x.ru>
>>
>
> I have tested your patch on top of Linux-Next (next-20130118) plus my
> own patchset (see file attachments)!
>
> [ TESTCASE ]
>
> # grep CONFIG_PM_DEBUG /boot/config-$(uname -r)
> CONFIG_PM_DEBUG=y
>
> # echo "freezer" > /sys/power/pm_test
>
> # cat /sys/power/pm_test
> none core processors platform devices [freezer]
>
> # echo mem > /sys/power/state && sleep 1 <--- 1st S/R: OK
>
> # echo mem > /sys/power/state && sleep 1 <--- 2nd S/R: OK, but caused
> a call-trace (see above)!
>
> [ /TESTCASE ]
>
> Unfortunately, I get now a different call-trace on the 2nd freezer/pm-test...
>
> +[ 368.891613] PM: Preparing system for mem sleep
> +[ 373.886722] Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.01 seconds) done.
> +[ 373.902741] Freezing remaining freezable tasks ...
> +[ 393.904587] Freezing of tasks failed after 20.01 seconds (1 tasks
> refusing to freeze, wq_busy=0):
> +[ 393.904714] jbd2/loop0-8 D 0000000000000003 0 304 2 0x00000000
> +[ 393.904723] ffff880117525b68 0000000000000046 00000000ffffffff
> ffff8801195d9400
> +[ 393.904731] ffff880117d74560 ffff880117525fd8 ffff880117525fd8
> ffff880117525fd8
> +[ 393.904738] ffff88004212c560 ffff880117d74560 ffff880117525b68
> ffff88011fad4738
> +[ 393.904745] Call Trace:
> +[ 393.904764] [<ffffffff811c6830>] ? __wait_on_buffer+0x30/0x30
> +[ 393.904772] [<ffffffff816b5079>] schedule+0x29/0x70
> +[ 393.904778] [<ffffffff816b514f>] io_schedule+0x8f/0xd0
> +[ 393.904785] [<ffffffff811c683e>] sleep_on_buffer+0xe/0x20
> +[ 393.904794] [<ffffffff816b394f>] __wait_on_bit+0x5f/0x90
> +[ 393.904801] [<ffffffff811c6830>] ? __wait_on_buffer+0x30/0x30
> +[ 393.904809] [<ffffffff816b39fc>] out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x7c/0x90
> +[ 393.904817] [<ffffffff8107eb00>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x40/0x40
> +[ 393.904824] [<ffffffff811c682e>] __wait_on_buffer+0x2e/0x30
> +[ 393.904836] [<ffffffff8128a14f>]
> jbd2_journal_commit_transaction+0xdef/0x1960
> +[ 393.904844] [<ffffffff816b620e>] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x2e/0x40
> +[ 393.904853] [<ffffffff81069fbf>] ? try_to_del_timer_sync+0x4f/0x70
> +[ 393.904859] [<ffffffff8128e938>] kjournald2+0xb8/0x240
> +[ 393.904865] [<ffffffff8107eac0>] ? add_wait_queue+0x60/0x60
> +[ 393.904871] [<ffffffff8128e880>] ? commit_timeout+0x10/0x10
> +[ 393.904877] [<ffffffff8107ded0>] kthread+0xc0/0xd0
> +[ 393.904883] [<ffffffff8107de10>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xb0/0xb0
> +[ 393.904889] [<ffffffff816bea2c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
> +[ 393.904894] [<ffffffff8107de10>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xb0/0xb0
> +[ 393.904972]
> +[ 393.904975] Restarting kernel threads ... done.
> +[ 393.905163] Restarting tasks ... done.
> +[ 393.914283] video LNXVIDEO:00: Restoring backlight state
>
> If this ring one or more bells to you let me know!
>
> Please, have a look at the file attachments!
> Thanks.
>
> Hope this helps us to track the problem!
>
I turned on...
CONFIG_EXT4_DEBUG=y
CONFIG_JBD2_DEBUG=y
...to see more light in the dark.
- Sedat -
> - Sedat -
>
>> ---
>> drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c | 92 +++++++++++-----------------------------------
>> 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c b/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c
>> index d6969f6..61ec4dd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c
>> @@ -119,11 +119,14 @@ static void __tty_buffer_flush(struct tty_port *port)
>> struct tty_bufhead *buf = &port->buf;
>> struct tty_buffer *thead;
>>
>> - while ((thead = buf->head) != NULL) {
>> - buf->head = thead->next;
>> - tty_buffer_free(port, thead);
>> + if (unlikely(buf->head == NULL))
>> + return;
>> + while ((thead = buf->head->next) != NULL) {
>> + tty_buffer_free(port, buf->head);
>> + buf->head = thead;
>> }
>> - buf->tail = NULL;
>> + WARN_ON(buf->head != buf->tail);
>> + buf->head->read = buf->head->commit;
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> @@ -194,19 +197,22 @@ static struct tty_buffer *tty_buffer_find(struct tty_port *port, size_t size)
>> have queued and recycle that ? */
>> }
>> /**
>> - * __tty_buffer_request_room - grow tty buffer if needed
>> + * tty_buffer_request_room - grow tty buffer if needed
>> * @tty: tty structure
>> * @size: size desired
>> *
>> * Make at least size bytes of linear space available for the tty
>> * buffer. If we fail return the size we managed to find.
>> - * Locking: Caller must hold port->buf.lock
>> + *
>> + * Locking: Takes port->buf.lock
>> */
>> -static int __tty_buffer_request_room(struct tty_port *port, size_t size)
>> +int tty_buffer_request_room(struct tty_port *port, size_t size)
>> {
>> struct tty_bufhead *buf = &port->buf;
>> struct tty_buffer *b, *n;
>> int left;
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&buf->lock, flags);
>> /* OPTIMISATION: We could keep a per tty "zero" sized buffer to
>> remove this conditional if its worth it. This would be invisible
>> to the callers */
>> @@ -228,31 +234,9 @@ static int __tty_buffer_request_room(struct tty_port *port, size_t size)
>> } else
>> size = left;
>> }
>> -
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&buf->lock, flags);
>> return size;
>> }
>> -
>> -
>> -/**
>> - * tty_buffer_request_room - grow tty buffer if needed
>> - * @port: tty port structure
>> - * @size: size desired
>> - *
>> - * Make at least size bytes of linear space available for the tty
>> - * buffer. If we fail return the size we managed to find.
>> - *
>> - * Locking: Takes port->buf.lock
>> - */
>> -int tty_buffer_request_room(struct tty_port *port, size_t size)
>> -{
>> - unsigned long flags;
>> - int length;
>> -
>> - spin_lock_irqsave(&port->buf.lock, flags);
>> - length = __tty_buffer_request_room(port, size);
>> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->buf.lock, flags);
>> - return length;
>> -}
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tty_buffer_request_room);
>>
>> /**
>> @@ -271,26 +255,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tty_buffer_request_room);
>> int tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag(struct tty_port *port,
>> const unsigned char *chars, char flag, size_t size)
>> {
>> - struct tty_bufhead *buf = &port->buf;
>> int copied = 0;
>> do {
>> int goal = min_t(size_t, size - copied, TTY_BUFFER_PAGE);
>> - int space;
>> - unsigned long flags;
>> - struct tty_buffer *tb;
>> -
>> - spin_lock_irqsave(&buf->lock, flags);
>> - space = __tty_buffer_request_room(port, goal);
>> - tb = buf->tail;
>> + int space = tty_buffer_request_room(port, goal);
>> + struct tty_buffer *tb = port->buf.tail;
>> /* If there is no space then tb may be NULL */
>> if (unlikely(space == 0)) {
>> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&buf->lock, flags);
>> break;
>> }
>> memcpy(tb->char_buf_ptr + tb->used, chars, space);
>> memset(tb->flag_buf_ptr + tb->used, flag, space);
>> tb->used += space;
>> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&buf->lock, flags);
>> copied += space;
>> chars += space;
>> /* There is a small chance that we need to split the data over
>> @@ -317,26 +293,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag);
>> int tty_insert_flip_string_flags(struct tty_port *port,
>> const unsigned char *chars, const char *flags, size_t size)
>> {
>> - struct tty_bufhead *buf = &port->buf;
>> int copied = 0;
>> do {
>> int goal = min_t(size_t, size - copied, TTY_BUFFER_PAGE);
>> - int space;
>> - unsigned long __flags;
>> - struct tty_buffer *tb;
>> -
>> - spin_lock_irqsave(&buf->lock, __flags);
>> - space = __tty_buffer_request_room(port, goal);
>> - tb = buf->tail;
>> + int space = tty_buffer_request_room(port, goal);
>> + struct tty_buffer *tb = port->buf.tail;
>> /* If there is no space then tb may be NULL */
>> if (unlikely(space == 0)) {
>> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&buf->lock, __flags);
>> break;
>> }
>> memcpy(tb->char_buf_ptr + tb->used, chars, space);
>> memcpy(tb->flag_buf_ptr + tb->used, flags, space);
>> tb->used += space;
>> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&buf->lock, __flags);
>> copied += space;
>> chars += space;
>> flags += space;
>> @@ -392,21 +360,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(tty_schedule_flip);
>> int tty_prepare_flip_string(struct tty_port *port, unsigned char **chars,
>> size_t size)
>> {
>> - struct tty_bufhead *buf = &port->buf;
>> - int space;
>> - unsigned long flags;
>> - struct tty_buffer *tb;
>> -
>> - spin_lock_irqsave(&buf->lock, flags);
>> - space = __tty_buffer_request_room(port, size);
>> -
>> - tb = buf->tail;
>> + int space = tty_buffer_request_room(port, size);
>> if (likely(space)) {
>> + struct tty_buffer *tb = port->buf.tail;
>> *chars = tb->char_buf_ptr + tb->used;
>> memset(tb->flag_buf_ptr + tb->used, TTY_NORMAL, space);
>> tb->used += space;
>> }
>> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&buf->lock, flags);
>> return space;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tty_prepare_flip_string);
>> @@ -430,21 +390,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tty_prepare_flip_string);
>> int tty_prepare_flip_string_flags(struct tty_port *port,
>> unsigned char **chars, char **flags, size_t size)
>> {
>> - struct tty_bufhead *buf = &port->buf;
>> - int space;
>> - unsigned long __flags;
>> - struct tty_buffer *tb;
>> -
>> - spin_lock_irqsave(&buf->lock, __flags);
>> - space = __tty_buffer_request_room(port, size);
>> -
>> - tb = buf->tail;
>> + int space = tty_buffer_request_room(port, size);
>> if (likely(space)) {
>> + struct tty_buffer *tb = port->buf.tail;
>> *chars = tb->char_buf_ptr + tb->used;
>> *flags = tb->flag_buf_ptr + tb->used;
>> tb->used += space;
>> }
>> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&buf->lock, __flags);
>> return space;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tty_prepare_flip_string_flags);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists