linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] (Was: ptrace: prevent PTRACE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 20 Jan 2013 20:35:42 +0100
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
	Kernel Security <security@...nel.org>,
	Michael Davidson <md@...gle.com>,
	Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
	Julien Tinnes <jln@...gle.com>,
	Aaron Durbin <adurbin@...gle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] (Was: ptrace: prevent PTRACE_SETREGS from
	corrupting stack)

On 01/20, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> > And we'd need to make sure to re-set the WAKEKILL flag not just in all
> > the callers of ptrace_check_attach(), but also in the failure case of
> > wait_task_inactive(). I'm not sure it can actually fail if we cleared
> > WAKEKILL, but it's all pretty subtle.
>
> Afaics it can't fail if we clear WAKEKILL... So 2/4 assumes it should
> always succeed and adds the warning.

Argh! It can, exactly because we can not kill may_ptrace_stop() yet.
I'll update and resend 2/4.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/