linux-kernel - Re: [PULL] kms locking rework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 20 Jan 2013 22:43:02 +0100
From:	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
To:	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Cc:	Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PULL] kms locking rework

On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:24 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> I am testing your patchset (original postings at [1]).
>> At a 1st look it seems to be OK.
>> Any tests you want me to run?
>
> Imo the fundamentals of the series are well-tested with the i-g-t
> series, so running things on as many (non-i915) gpus as possible is
> the most interesting thing. I just don't have that many radeon/nouveau
> machines lying around for that ...
>

I am here on SNB, so.

> If you want to get really fancy, set up a zaphod dual-head config with
> 2 independent X servers to check whether concurrent pageflips don't
> cause havoc. That needs something which pageflips, ofc.

Sounds like a lot of work...
Any docs/wiki around to manage such a setup?

- Sedat -

> -Daniel
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/