linux-kernel - [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/12] rcu: Rename n_nocb_gp_requests to need_future

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 26 Jan 2013 16:30:01 -0800
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
	josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
	dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, darren@...art.com,
	fweisbec@...il.com, sbw@....edu,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/12] rcu: Rename n_nocb_gp_requests to need_future_gp

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>

CPUs going idle need to be able to indicate their need for future grace
periods.  A mechanism for doing this already exists for no-callbacks
CPUs, so the idea is to re-use that mechanism.  This commit therefore
moves the ->n_nocb_gp_requests field of the rcu_node structure out from
under the CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU #ifdef and renames it to ->need_future_gp.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcutree.h        |    4 ++--
 kernel/rcutree_plugin.h |   18 +++++++++---------
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.h b/kernel/rcutree.h
index 96a27f9..034b524 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.h
@@ -194,9 +194,9 @@ struct rcu_node {
 #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU
 	wait_queue_head_t nocb_gp_wq[2];
 				/* Place for rcu_nocb_kthread() to wait GP. */
-	int n_nocb_gp_requests[2];
-				/* Counts of upcoming no-CB GP requests. */
 #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU */
+	int need_future_gp[2];
+				/* Counts of upcoming no-CB GP requests. */
 	raw_spinlock_t fqslock ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp;
 } ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp;
 
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index 7a66312..9647a6b 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -2064,7 +2064,7 @@ static int rcu_nocb_needs_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp)
 {
 	struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
 
-	return rnp->n_nocb_gp_requests[(ACCESS_ONCE(rnp->completed) + 1) & 0x1];
+	return rnp->need_future_gp[(ACCESS_ONCE(rnp->completed) + 1) & 0x1];
 }
 
 /*
@@ -2078,8 +2078,8 @@ static int rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
 	int needmore;
 
 	wake_up_all(&rnp->nocb_gp_wq[c & 0x1]);
-	rnp->n_nocb_gp_requests[c & 0x1] = 0;
-	needmore = rnp->n_nocb_gp_requests[(c + 1) & 0x1];
+	rnp->need_future_gp[c & 0x1] = 0;
+	needmore = rnp->need_future_gp[(c + 1) & 0x1];
 	trace_rcu_future_grace_period(rsp->name, rnp->gpnum, rnp->completed,
 				      c, rnp->level, rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi,
 				      needmore ? "CleanupMore" : "Cleanup");
@@ -2087,7 +2087,7 @@ static int rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
 }
 
 /*
- * Set the root rcu_node structure's ->n_nocb_gp_requests field
+ * Set the root rcu_node structure's ->need_future_gp field
  * based on the sum of those of all rcu_node structures.  This does
  * double-count the root rcu_node structure's requests, but this
  * is necessary to handle the possibility of a rcu_nocb_kthread()
@@ -2096,7 +2096,7 @@ static int rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
  */
 static void rcu_nocb_gp_set(struct rcu_node *rnp, int nrq)
 {
-	rnp->n_nocb_gp_requests[(rnp->completed + 1) & 0x1] += nrq;
+	rnp->need_future_gp[(rnp->completed + 1) & 0x1] += nrq;
 }
 
 static void rcu_init_one_nocb(struct rcu_node *rnp)
@@ -2227,7 +2227,7 @@ static void rcu_nocb_wait_gp(struct rcu_data *rdp)
 	c = rnp->completed + 2;
 
 	/* Count our request for a grace period. */
-	rnp->n_nocb_gp_requests[c & 0x1]++;
+	rnp->need_future_gp[c & 0x1]++;
 	trace_rcu_future_grace_period(rdp->rsp->name, rnp->gpnum,
 				      rnp->completed, c, rnp->level,
 				      rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi, "Startleaf");
@@ -2271,10 +2271,10 @@ static void rcu_nocb_wait_gp(struct rcu_data *rdp)
 			 * Adjust counters accordingly and start the
 			 * needed grace period.
 			 */
-			rnp->n_nocb_gp_requests[c & 0x1]--;
+			rnp->need_future_gp[c & 0x1]--;
 			c = rnp_root->completed + 1;
-			rnp->n_nocb_gp_requests[c & 0x1]++;
-			rnp_root->n_nocb_gp_requests[c & 0x1]++;
+			rnp->need_future_gp[c & 0x1]++;
+			rnp_root->need_future_gp[c & 0x1]++;
 			trace_rcu_future_grace_period(rdp->rsp->name,
 						      rnp->gpnum,
 						      rnp->completed,
-- 
1.7.8

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/