linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] PCI: don't touch enable_cnt in pci_device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 28 Jan 2013 16:44:46 -0700
From:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To:	Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Khalid Aziz <hikerockies@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] PCI: don't touch enable_cnt in pci_device_shutdown()

[+cc Khalid new email addr]

On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov
> <khlebnikov@...nvz.org> wrote:
>> comment in commit b566a22c23327f18ce941ffad0ca907e50a53d41
>> ("PCI: disable Bus Master on PCI device shutdown") says:
>>
>> | Disable Bus Master bit on the device in pci_device_shutdown() to ensure PCI
>> | devices do not continue to DMA data after shutdown.  This can cause memory
>> | corruption in case of a kexec where the current kernel shuts down and
>> | transfers control to a new kernel while a PCI device continues to DMA to
>> | memory that does not belong to it any more in the new kernel.
>>
>> Seems like pci_clear_master() must be used here instead of pci_disable_device(),
>> because it disables Bus Muster unconditionally and doesn't changes enable_cnt.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>
>> Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
>> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
>> Cc: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/pci/pci-driver.c |    2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
>> index 030dbf0..853d605 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
>> @@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ static void pci_device_shutdown(struct device *dev)
>>          * Turn off Bus Master bit on the device to tell it to not
>>          * continue to do DMA
>>          */
>> -       pci_disable_device(pci_dev);
>> +       pci_clear_master(pci_dev);
>
> We currently only call pci_enable_device() and pci_disable_device()
> from drivers, and I think that's a nice division that's worth keeping.
>  It keeps the core's mitts off device operation and helps preserve the
> enable_cnt integrity.  So I like this change from that perspective.
>
> Any objections to this, Khalid?
>
>>  }
>>
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/