linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/11] ksm: NUMA trees and page migration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 28 Jan 2013 17:07:15 -0800 (PST)
From:	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
	Petr Holasek <pholasek@...hat.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Izik Eidus <izik.eidus@...ellosystems.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] ksm: NUMA trees and page migration

On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:53:10 -0800 (PST)
> Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com> wrote:
> 
> > Here's a KSM series
> 
> Sanity check: do you have a feeling for how useful KSM is? 
> Performance/space improvements for typical (or atypical) workloads? 
> Are people using it?  Successfully?
> 
> IOW, is it justifying itself?

I have no idea!  To me it's simply a technical challenge - and I agree
with your implication that that's not a good enough justification.

I've added Marcelo and Gleb and the KVM list to the Cc:
my understanding is that it's the KVM guys who really appreciate KSM.

Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/