lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:55:24 +0800
From:	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
CC:	Avi Kivity <avi.kivity@...il.com>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] KVM: MMU: simplify mmu_set_spte

On 01/29/2013 08:21 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 06:05:29PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> In order to detecting spte remapping, we can simply check whether the
>> spte has already been pointing to the pfn even if the spte is not the
>> last spte, for middle spte is pointing to the kernel pfn which can not
>> be mapped to userspace
> 
> This check is detecting spte overwrite, when a large spte is replaced by 
> pointer to spte table.
> 
> Can't see why check for different pfn is safe: only 'int level' can
> differ, and pfn be equivalent, for example.

The 'u64 *sptep' must on the "int level" we want to set, that means:
 page_header(__pa(sptep)).role.level == "int level".


We discussed this before :), the discussion can be found at:
http://marc.info/?l=kvm&m=135345057329427&w=2.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ