linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3] cpufreq: Simplify cpufreq_add

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 30 Jan 2013 07:41:44 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	inderpal.singh@...aro.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
	robin.randhawa@....com, Steve.Bannister@....com,
	Liviu.Dudau@....com,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] cpufreq: Simplify cpufreq_add_dev()

On 30 January 2013 03:15, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> Please don't add my sign-offs in advance.  Yes, I have signed off a *previous*
> version of that patch, but that doesn't apply to *this* version automatically.
>
> While you can do such things with Acked-by or Reviewed-by tags (that's not very
> polite, but people usually don't mind), sign-off is a bit different, because
> it is a *certificate* that this particular patch (and not some previous version
> of it) has gone through my hands.
>
> I'm going to apply this, but please be more careful in the future.

Its not that i have added it, but forgot to remove it. :(
I picked the patch from linux-next/master and forgot to remove your SOB.

--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/