| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 06:40:02 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>, Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@....de>, "linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org> Subject: Re: BUG: circular locking dependency detected On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:26:53AM +1100, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk> wrote: > > > > Which may or may not be a good thing depending how you look at it; it > > means that once your kernel blanks, you get a lockdep dump. At that > > point you lose lockdep checking for everything else because lockdep > > disables itself after the first dump. > > Fair enough, we may want to revert the lockdep checking for > console_lock, and make re-enabling it part of the patch-series that > fixes the locking. > > Daniel/Dave? Does that sound reasonable? Reverting the patch is fine with me. Just let me know so I can queue it up again for 3.9. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists