linux-kernel - Re: PAE problems was [RFC] Reproducible OOM with just a few sleeps

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 01 Feb 2013 18:45:32 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>, Phil Turmel <philip@...mel.org>,
	paul.szabo@...ney.edu.au, dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: PAE problems was [RFC] Reproducible OOM with just a few sleeps

On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 08:57 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
[...]
> OK, so by the time this thread gets to me there is of course no 
> information in it.

Here's the history: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/93278

> The vast majority of all 32-bit kernels compiled these days are PAE, so 
> it would seem rather odd if PAE was totally broken.

Indeed.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.
                                                           - Albert Einstein

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)