linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 09/10] clk: tegra: Implement clocks for Tegra114

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 4 Feb 2013 16:07:55 +0200
From:	Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
To:	Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>
CC:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	Joseph Lo <josephl@...dia.com>,
	"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org" 
	<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/10] clk: tegra: Implement clocks for Tegra114

On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 11:45:31AM +0100, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 08:08:55AM +0100, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:

...

> > > +
> > > +       /* dsia */
> > > +       clk = clk_register_mux(NULL, "dsia_mux", mux_plld_out0_plld2_out0,
> > > +                              ARRAY_SIZE(mux_plld_out0_plld2_out0), 0,
> > > +                              clk_base + PLLD_BASE, 25, 1, 0, &pll_d_lock);
> > > +       clks[dsia_mux] = clk;
> > > +       clk = tegra_clk_register_periph_gate("dsia", "dsia_mux", 0, clk_base,
> > > +                                   0, 48, &periph_h_regs,
> > > +                                   periph_clk_enb_refcnt);
> > > +       clk_register_clkdev(clk, "dsia", "tegradc.0");
> > > +       clks[dsia] = clk;
> > > +
> > > +       /* dsib */
> > > +       clk = clk_register_mux(NULL, "dsib_mux", mux_plld_out0_plld2_out0,
> > > +                              ARRAY_SIZE(mux_plld_out0_plld2_out0), 0,
> > > +                              clk_base + PLLD2_BASE, 25, 1, 0, &pll_d2_lock);
> > > +       clks[dsib_mux] = clk;
> > > +       clk = tegra_clk_register_periph_gate("dsib", "dsib_mux", 0, clk_base,
> > > +                                   0, 82, &periph_u_regs,
> > > +                                   periph_clk_enb_refcnt);
> > > +       clk_register_clkdev(clk, "dsib", "tegradc.1");
> > > +       clks[dsib] = clk;
> > > +
> > 
> > Can we use periph no div clock here for dsia and dsib?
> > 
> 
> Will check.
> 

Not as such. As you can see the muxes need a lock to protect access to the
PLLD_BASE and PLLD2_BASE registers respectively. The periph no div clock
doesn't provide for these locks though. Do you think it makes sense to add
the lock support for these 2 clocks?

Cheers,

Peter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/