linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/13] workqueue: don't set work cwq until we queued it on pool

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 5 Feb 2013 08:45:20 -0800
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Lai Jiangshan <eag0628@...il.com>
Cc:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/13] workqueue: don't set work cwq until we queued it
 on pool

Hey, Lai.

On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 11:00:42PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> The @cpu can be WORK_CPU_UNBOUND, and the current code will delay
> to determine on which cpu should this work be queued until timeout,
> I didn't want to change this behavior when I wrote the patch.

Hmmm?  The current code determines the CPU on queue_delayed_work().

       	/*
	 * If we cannot get the last pool from @work directly,
	 * select the last CPU such that it avoids unnecessarily
	 * triggering non-reentrancy check in __queue_work().
	 */
	lcpu = cpu;
	if (pool)
		lcpu = pool->cpu;
	if (lcpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND)
		lcpu = raw_smp_processor_id();

@lcpu is never WORK_CPU_UNBOUND for bound workqueues and for unbound
workqueues we of course have cwq for WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.

> PS, again, @cpu and @wq can be saved/encoded in dwork.work.entry if needed.

If possible, I'd much prefer to keep it inside delayed_work() proper.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/