linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/14] pinctrl/abx500: use direct IRQ defines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 08 Feb 2013 10:06:20 -0700
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC:	Anmar Oueja <anmar.oueja@...aro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] pinctrl/abx500: use direct IRQ defines

On 02/08/2013 01:25 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Feb 2013, Stephen Warren wrote:
> 
>> On 02/07/2013 02:01 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> I don't see myself on cc. Was that intentional?
>>
>> The original patch was that way; I assume git send-email only CC'd you
>> on patches written by you.
> 
> No, I didn't send this patch at all.
> 
> I was asking Linus if he ment to CC me, as I thought I should have been.
> 
>>> I quite like the idea of this.
>>>
>>> Stephen,
>>>
>>> It doesn't mean the other patch was wrong, it just transfers the math.
>>
>> Ah, I see. The issue is that the code below clearly calculates the hwirq
>> differently, and it wasn't immediately obvious that this part of the
>> patch for example:
>>
>>>  struct abx500_gpio_irq_cluster ab8500_gpio_irq_cluster[] = {
>>> -	GPIO_IRQ_CLUSTER(6,  13, 34),
>>> -	GPIO_IRQ_CLUSTER(24, 25, 24),
>>> -	GPIO_IRQ_CLUSTER(36, 41, 14),
>>> +	GPIO_IRQ_CLUSTER(6,  13, AB8500_INT_GPIO6R),
>>> +	GPIO_IRQ_CLUSTER(24, 25, AB8500_INT_GPIO24R),
>>> +	GPIO_IRQ_CLUSTER(36, 41, AB8500_INT_GPIO36R),
>>>  };
>>
>> ... actually changes the values in the table (AB8500_INT_GPIO6R is 40,
>> so when using that value, you need to subtract of the value 6 for the
>> base to get the original 34).
> 
> Yes, I see how that may of looked if you didn't see the other change.
> 
> So you're happy?

Yes.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/