linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: Lock down MSR writing in secure boot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 8 Feb 2013 19:27:09 +0000
From:	Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>
To:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
	"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org" 
	<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Lock down MSR writing in secure boot

On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 11:21 -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Matthew Garrett
> <matthew.garrett@...ula.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 11:12 -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> Writing to MSRs should not be allowed unless CAP_COMPROMISE_KERNEL is
> >> set since it could lead to execution of arbitrary code in kernel mode.
> >
> > Willing to buy this, but do you have a description of one potential
> > approach? We should probably also figure out what's writing to MSRs at
> > the moment (anything other than energy_perf_bias?) and decide what the
> > best thing to do there is.
> 
> Yes, change the SYSENTER entry point to where-ever you like. There are
> examples already written:
> http://grsecurity.net/~spender/msr32.c

Cool. Yup, this sounds like a good plan.