| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 21:02:37 +0100 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> Cc: valdis.kletnieks@...edu, artem.savkov@...il.com, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, robin.randhawa@....com, Steve.Bannister@....com, Liviu.Dudau@....com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq Fixes for 3.9 On Friday, February 08, 2013 08:06:52 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 8 February 2013 18:02, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote: > > So as I said, please rework the fixes on top of linux-pm.git/pm-cpufreq. > > I already did. Please check for-rafael branch Cool. This is the one I'm supposed to apply, then? > > Moreover, I'd very much prefer it if you fixed the problems introduced by > > b8eed8a "cpufreq: Simplify __cpufreq_remove_dev()" separately and *then* any > > other locking problems you're seeing in the code, although people are not > > reporting them. > > > > You seem to have a clear picture of how the code should work now, so that > > won't be a big trouble I guess. > > For me all problems are fixed in the current code. :) Sounds great. :-) Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists