lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 08 Feb 2013 22:04:48 +0000
From:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Cc:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
	Grant Likely <glikely@...retlab.ca>,
	Srinivas KANDAGATLA <srinivas.kandagatla@...com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8] kbuild: create a rule to run the pre-processor on *.dts files

On Fri, 08 Feb 2013 15:24:25 -0600, Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com> wrote:
> On 02/08/2013 08:45 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Tue,  5 Feb 2013 12:06:28 -0700, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org> wrote:
> >> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
> >>
> >> Create cmd_dtc_cpp to run the C pre-processor on *.dts file before
> >> passing them to dtc for final compilation. This allows the use of #define
> >> and #include within the .dts file.
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>
> >> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
> >> Acked-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
> >> Acked-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
> > 
> > I've applied this and was going to push it out, but I've just thought of
> > a problem that could be a show stopper. Once a dtsp file includes a C
> > header, the contents of that header become part of the Device Tree ABI.
> > If someone changes that file (ie. to renumber a series of #defines) then
> > that will break the binding. We need a way to protect against that.
> > Someone changing a .h file may make the assumption that it is only
> > kernel internal and won't realize that it has external implications.
> > 
> > I'm thinking that any dts includes need to be treated in the same way as
> > userspace headers. We could put them into include/uapi and piggy back on
> > the protection already afforded by that directory, or come up with
> > something new. Any thoughts?
> 
> Also, we would never be able to separate the dts files from the kernel
> tree without some separation.

Good point. They better be in a completely separate directory then.

g.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ