linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: Lock down MSR writing in secure boot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 13 Feb 2013 06:27:40 +0000
From:	Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
	"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Lock down MSR writing in secure boot

On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 22:12 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> Sounds like you are thinking of CAP_SYS_ADMIN, but I don't really see a 
> huge difference between MSRs and I/O control registers... just different 
> address spaces.

Not having CAP_SYS_RAWIO blocks various SCSI commands, for instance.
These might result in the ability to write individual blocks or destroy
the device firmware, but do any of them permit modifying the running
kernel?