linux-kernel - [PATCH 09/12] FIX [2/2] slub: Tid must be retrieved from the percpu area of the current processor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 13 Feb 2013 17:13:48 +0100
From:	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
	Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 09/12] FIX [2/2] slub: Tid must be retrieved from the percpu area of the current processor

From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>

As Steven Rostedt has pointer out: Rescheduling could occur on a differnet processor
after the determination of the per cpu pointer and before the tid is retrieved.
This could result in allocation from the wrong node in slab_alloc.

The effect is much more severe in slab_free() where we could free to the freelist
of the wrong page.

The window for something like that occurring is pretty small but it is possible.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
---
 mm/slub.c |   12 +++++++++---
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index fbf6810..634aabc 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2313,13 +2313,18 @@ static __always_inline void *slab_alloc(struct kmem_cache *s,
 		return NULL;
 
 redo:
-
 	/*
 	 * Must read kmem_cache cpu data via this cpu ptr. Preemption is
 	 * enabled. We may switch back and forth between cpus while
 	 * reading from one cpu area. That does not matter as long
 	 * as we end up on the original cpu again when doing the cmpxchg.
+	 *
+	 * Preemption is disabled for the retrieval of the tid because that
+	 * must occur from the current processor. We cannot allow rescheduling
+	 * on a different processor between the determination of the pointer
+	 * and the retrieval of the tid.
 	 */
+	preempt_disable();
 	c = __this_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab);
 
 	/*
@@ -2329,7 +2334,7 @@ static __always_inline void *slab_alloc(struct kmem_cache *s,
 	 * linked list in between.
 	 */
 	tid = c->tid;
-	barrier();
+	preempt_enable();
 
 	object = c->freelist;
 	if (unlikely(!object || !node_match(c, node)))
@@ -2575,10 +2580,11 @@ static __always_inline void slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s,
 	 * data is retrieved via this pointer. If we are on the same cpu
 	 * during the cmpxchg then the free will succedd.
 	 */
+	preempt_disable();
 	c = __this_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab);
 
 	tid = c->tid;
-	barrier();
+	preempt_enable();
 
 	if (likely(page == c->page)) {
 		set_freepointer(s, object, c->freelist);
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/