lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 17:34:36 -0800 From: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com> To: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com> CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>, linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>, Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Lock down MSR writing in secure boot On 2/13/2013 5:04 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 16:44 -0800, Casey Schaufler wrote: > >> If you want that sort of granularity throw yourself on the SELinux >> bandwagon. Fine grained capabilities are insane and unmanageable >> and will only lead to tears. Security is despised because of the >> notion that making systems impossible to use is a good thing. > SELinux is completely unusable for this specific case. > Well, you'll get no argument from me there. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists