lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:56:55 -0800
From:	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com>
To:	Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>
Cc:	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
	Liujiang <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
	WuJianguo <wujianguo@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] ia64/mm: fix a bad_page bug when crash kernel booting

Foolishly sent an earlier reply from Outlook which appears
to have mangled/lost it. Trying again ...

> In efi_init() memory aligns in IA64_GRANULE_SIZE(16M). If set "crashkernel=1024M-:600M"

Is this where the real problem begins?  Should we insist that users
provide crashkernel
parameters rounded to GRANULE boundaries?

-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ