linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/35] mfd: ab8500-core: Rework MFD sub-device initialisation structures

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 20 Feb 2013 08:09:56 +0000
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	sameo@...ux.intel.com, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/35] mfd: ab8500-core: Rework MFD sub-device
 initialisation structures

On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> On Friday 15 February 2013, Lee Jones wrote:
> > +       {
> > +               .name = "ab8500-charger",
> > +               .of_compatible = "stericsson,ab8500-charger",
> > +               .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(ab8500_charger_resources),
> > +               .resources = ab8500_charger_resources,
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_OF
> > +               .platform_data = &ab8500_bm_data,
> > +               .pdata_size = sizeof(ab8500_bm_data),
> > +#endif
> > +       },
> 
> Is this #ifdef correct? I would have expected "#ifdef CONFIG_ATAGS"
> here.

No, it's not correct. See: 23a04f9f40f2b32ee593b768483105b1c776814d

I will fixup when the branched is rebased post-merge.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/