lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:55:59 -0800
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf x86: Change SandyBridge and IvyBrige instructions event to be precise

Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> writes:

> Changing the default 'instructions' HW event for SandyBridge and
> IvyBrige to use the available precise 'instructions' event.
>
> The precise event is defined in Intel SDM as:
>
> INST_RETIRED.ALL - Precise instruction retired event with HW to
> reduce effect of PEBS shadow in IP distribution
>
> for both SandyBridge and IvyBrige micro-archs. It allows to use
> precise modifier on 'instructions' event on SandyBridge and
> IvyBrige micro-archs which is not possible now.

Actually it's possible, you just have to use it explicitely.

This will break a lot of profiling setups that assume instructions
count on the fixed counter and use the 4/8 other counters. 
Also it will give very bad results with perf stat, which
you don't want to run with pebs.

Even worse with your change the fixed instruction counter is not
accessible anymore. So pretty much all the standard setups
that collect it in addition to other events and fill all 
the counters would break.

I don't think it should be done by default, but yes explicitely
it's quite useful.

My Haswell patchkit (in the "extended version") exposes
the precise event as "instructions-p" through sysfs.

-Andi

-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ