linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] tmpfs: fix mempolicy object leaks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:06:43 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc:	Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tmpfs: fix mempolicy object leaks

On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:26:26 -0800 (PST)
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com> wrote:

> > @@ -2463,19 +2464,23 @@ static int shmem_parse_options(char *options, struct shmem_sb_info *sbinfo,
> >  			if (!gid_valid(sbinfo->gid))
> >  				goto bad_val;
> >  		} else if (!strcmp(this_char,"mpol")) {
> > -			if (mpol_parse_str(value, &sbinfo->mpol))
> > +			mpol_put(mpol);
> 
> I haven't tested to check, but don't we need
> 			mpol = NULL;
> here, in case the new option turns out to be bad?

We do.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/