| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:58:30 -0800 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, jkosina@...e.cz, keyrings@...ux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] KEYS: Revert one application of "Fix unreachable code" patch On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:24:32 +0000 David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote: > A patch to fix some unreachable code in search_my_process_keyrings() got > applied twice by two different routes upstream: > > commit e67eab39bee26f509d38d00ca1a8f24b63f46a31 > Author: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com> > Date: Thu Dec 20 15:05:54 2012 -0800 > keys: fix unreachable code > > and: > > commit b010520ab3d2c05eb444ed5e01fe6c33842f597a > Author: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com> > Date: Thu Oct 25 15:23:35 2012 +0100 > keys: Fix unreachable code > > Unfortunately, the second application removed something it shouldn't have and > this wasn't detected by GIT. This is due to the patch not having sufficient > lines of context to distinguish the two places of application. > > So revert the second application of the patch. The runtime effects of this aren't described, so I don't know whether the omission of cc:stable was deliberate :( -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists