linux-kernel - Re: [ 00/66] 3.2.39-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 20 Feb 2013 02:59:04 +0000
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	Satoru Takeuchi <satoru.takeuchi@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [ 00/66] 3.2.39-stable review

On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 07:25 +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
> At Sun, 17 Feb 2013 22:50:01 +0000,
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > 
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.39 release.
> > There are 66 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Tue Feb 19 23:00:00 UTC 2013.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > A combined patch relative to 3.2.38 will be posted as an additional
> > response to this.  A shortlog and diffstat can be found below.
> 
> This kernel can be built and boot without any problem.
> Building a kernel with this kernel also works fine.
> 
>  - Build Machine: debian wheezy x86_64
>    CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz x 4
>    memory: 8GB
> 
>  - Test machine: debian wheezy x86_64(KVM guest on the Build Machine)
>    vCPU: x2
>    memory: 2GB
> 
> I reviewed the following patches and it looks good to me.
[...]

Thanks.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Sturgeon's Law: Ninety percent of everything is crap.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)