lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 27 Feb 2013 18:38:11 +0800
From:	Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
To:	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
CC:	roger.pau@...rix.com, stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
	dgdegra@...ho.nsa.gov,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/block/xen-blkback: preq.dev is used without initialized

于 2013年02月27日 17:57, Jan Beulich 写道:
> You also could have mentioned that even before commit 
> 01c681d4c70d64cb72142a2823f27c4146a02e63 the value printed
> here was bogus, as it was the guest provided value from
> req->u.rw.handle rather than the actual device.

  pardon ?

  I guess what you said is :
    my patch seems ok, but the comments need improving.
    need add "additional info" in comments:
      "before commit 01c681d4c70d64cb72142a2823f27c4146a02e63
       the value printed here was bogus, as it was the guest
       provided value from req->u.rw.handle rather than the
       actual device".

  is it correct ?

  thanks.

-- 
Chen Gang

Asianux Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ