linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: ondemand: Don't update sample

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:59:11 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	rjw@...k.pl
Cc:	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
	robin.randhawa@....com, Steve.Bannister@....com,
	Liviu.Dudau@....com, charles.garcia-tobin@....com,
	rickard.andersson@...ricsson.com, fabio.baltieri@...aro.org,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: ondemand: Don't update sample_type if we don't evaluate load again

Because we have per cpu timer now, we check if we need to evaluate load again or
not (In case it is recently evaluated). Here the 2nd cpu which got timer
interrupt updates core_dbs_info->sample_type irrespective of load evaluation is
required or not. Which is wrong as the first cpu is dependent on this variable
set to an older value.

Moreover it would be best in this case to schedule 2nd cpu's timer to
sampling_rate instead of freq_lo or hi as that must be managed by the other cpu.
In case the other cpu idles in between then also we wouldn't loose much power.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 24 +++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
index f3eb26c..a815c88 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
@@ -223,34 +223,32 @@ static void od_dbs_timer(struct work_struct *work)
 	unsigned int cpu = dbs_info->cdbs.cur_policy->cpu;
 	struct od_cpu_dbs_info_s *core_dbs_info = &per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info,
 			cpu);
-	int delay, sample_type = core_dbs_info->sample_type;
-	bool eval_load;
+	int delay = 0, sample_type = core_dbs_info->sample_type;
 
 	mutex_lock(&core_dbs_info->cdbs.timer_mutex);
-	eval_load = need_load_eval(&core_dbs_info->cdbs,
-			od_tuners.sampling_rate);
+	if (!need_load_eval(&core_dbs_info->cdbs, od_tuners.sampling_rate))
+		goto max_delay;
 
 	/* Common NORMAL_SAMPLE setup */
 	core_dbs_info->sample_type = OD_NORMAL_SAMPLE;
 	if (sample_type == OD_SUB_SAMPLE) {
 		delay = core_dbs_info->freq_lo_jiffies;
-		if (eval_load)
-			__cpufreq_driver_target(core_dbs_info->cdbs.cur_policy,
-						core_dbs_info->freq_lo,
-						CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
+		__cpufreq_driver_target(core_dbs_info->cdbs.cur_policy,
+				core_dbs_info->freq_lo, CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
 	} else {
-		if (eval_load)
-			dbs_check_cpu(&od_dbs_data, cpu);
+		dbs_check_cpu(&od_dbs_data, cpu);
 		if (core_dbs_info->freq_lo) {
 			/* Setup timer for SUB_SAMPLE */
 			core_dbs_info->sample_type = OD_SUB_SAMPLE;
 			delay = core_dbs_info->freq_hi_jiffies;
-		} else {
-			delay = delay_for_sampling_rate(od_tuners.sampling_rate
-						* core_dbs_info->rate_mult);
 		}
 	}
 
+max_delay:
+	if (!delay)
+		delay = delay_for_sampling_rate(od_tuners.sampling_rate
+				* core_dbs_info->rate_mult);
+
 	schedule_delayed_work_on(smp_processor_id(), dw, delay);
 	mutex_unlock(&core_dbs_info->cdbs.timer_mutex);
 }
-- 
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/