linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] slub: correctly bootstrap boot caches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:46:59 +0400
From:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
To:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
CC:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] slub: correctly bootstrap boot caches

On 02/27/2013 11:47 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Glauber Costa wrote:
>>
>>> On 02/22/2013 09:01 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>>>> Argh. This one was the final version:
>>>>
>>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2009521/
>>>>
>>>
>>> It seems it would work. It is all the same to me.
>>> Which one do you prefer?
>>
>> Flushing seems to be simpler and less code.
> 
> Well, I completely lost track of what to apply... Can someone please
> send me the final version that everybody agrees on with proper ACKs
> and other attributions?
> 
You can apply this one as-is with Christoph's ACK.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/