linux-kernel - Re: mmap vs fs cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 05 Mar 2013 15:55:02 -0800
From:	Howard Chu <hyc@...as.com>
To:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mmap vs fs cache

Howard Chu wrote:
> 2 questions:
>     why is there data in the FS cache that isn't owned by (the mmap of) the
> process that caused it to be paged in in the first place?
>     is there a tunable knob to discourage the page cache from stealing from the
> process?

This Unmapped page cache control http://lwn.net/Articles/436010/ sounds like 
it might have been helpful here. I.e., having a way to prioritize so that 
unmapped cache pages get reclaimed in preference to mapped pages could help. 
Though I still don't understand why these pages in the cache aren't mapped in 
the first place.

-- 
   -- Howard Chu
   CTO, Symas Corp.           http://www.symas.com
   Director, Highland Sun     http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
   Chief Architect, OpenLDAP  http://www.openldap.org/project/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/