| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 15:43:32 +0200 From: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com> To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, Peter Chen <peter.chen@...escale.com> Subject: Re: v3.9-rc1: swapper/0 [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] On 6 March 2013 12:33, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Just noticed this in 3.9-rc1 on an iMX28 (ARM) board with a config > based on mxs_defconfig. I'm using the patchset "Add tested id switch > and vbus connect detect support for Chipidea" from Peter Chen in its > 10th version [1], rebased on top of 3.9-rc1, but since this doesn't > modify the locks present in the udc_irq function, I think the problem > is elsewhere. >From a quick look at the current chipidea code, I don't see any place where we might try to take cdev->lock under ci->lock. I should have a better look at Peter's patchset to see if it can trigger that. Peter, have you seen anything like that with your code? Is this easy to trigger (I would assume it is)? Can you post the contents of "events" debug file in sysfs? Thanks, -- Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists