| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 13:40:04 -0500 From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com> To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>, Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...omium.org>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk> Subject: Re: LOCKDEP: 3.9-rc1: mount.nfs/4272 still has locks held! On Wed, 6 Mar 2013 19:17:35 +0100 Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote: > On 03/05, Jeff Layton wrote: > > > > Anyone up for working out how to handle a freeze event on a process > > that already has a pending signal, while it's being ptraced? > > Could you explain the problem? > Not very well. I was just saying that the signal/ptrace stuff is very complicated already. Now we're looking at mixing in the freezer too, which further increases the complexity. Though when I said that, it was before Tejun mentioned hooking this up to ptrace. I'll confess that I don't fully understand what he's proposing either though... -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists