linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 6/4] ipc: open code and rename sem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 6 Mar 2013 17:14:43 -0500
From:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To:	Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Emmanuel Benisty <benisty.e@...il.com>,
	"Vinod, Chegu" <chegu_vinod@...com>,
	"Low, Jason" <jason.low2@...com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, aquini@...hat.com,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Larry Woodman <lwoodman@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 6/4] ipc: open code and rename sem_lock

Rename sem_lock to sem_obtain_lock, so we can introduce a sem_lock
function later that only locks the sem_array and does nothing else.

Open code the locking from ipc_lock in sem_obtain_lock, so we can
introduce finer grained locking for the sem_array in the next patch.

Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
---
 ipc/sem.c |   23 +++++++++++++++++++----
 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c
index efb49e7..d92ba32 100644
--- a/ipc/sem.c
+++ b/ipc/sem.c
@@ -194,14 +194,29 @@ void __init sem_init (void)
  * sem_lock_(check_) routines are called in the paths where the rw_mutex
  * is not held.
  */
-static inline struct sem_array *sem_lock(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int id)
+static inline struct sem_array *sem_obtain_lock(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int id)
 {
-	struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp = ipc_lock(&sem_ids(ns), id);
+	struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp;
 
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	ipcp = ipc_obtain_object(&sem_ids(ns), id);
 	if (IS_ERR(ipcp))
-		return (struct sem_array *)ipcp;
+		goto err1;
+
+	write_lock(&ipcp->lock);
+
+	/* ipc_rmid() may have already freed the ID while write_lock
+	 * was spinning: verify that the structure is still valid
+	 */
+	if (ipcp->deleted)
+		goto err0;
 
 	return container_of(ipcp, struct sem_array, sem_perm);
+err0:
+	write_unlock(&ipcp->lock);
+err1:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+	return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 }
 
 static inline struct sem_array *sem_obtain_object(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int id)
@@ -1558,7 +1573,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(semtimedop, int, semid, struct sembuf __user *, tsops,
 		goto out_free;
 	}
 
-	sma = sem_lock(ns, semid);
+	sma = sem_obtain_lock(ns, semid);
 
 	/*
 	 * Wait until it's guaranteed that no wakeup_sem_queue_do() is ongoing.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/