linux-kernel - wfcqueue (in Userspace RCU) for Linux kernel (for epoll)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 11 Mar 2013 19:35:41 +0000
From:	Eric Wong <normalperson@...t.net>
To:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
Subject: wfcqueue (in Userspace RCU) for Linux kernel (for epoll)

Hi, I'm looking to reduce contention for the ep->lock spin lock in epoll.

I came across wfcqueue in Userspace RCU and am wondering if there's any
reason (other that lack of developer time/users) it hasn't been adapted
for the Linux kernel.

I'd be happy to do the work if it's suitable (and omit parts which
may not be, such as busy wait).

Using a mutex lock (while in process context) for dequeue works for
epoll.  I mainly want a lock-free enqueue for ep_poll_callback since
that may be called in IRQ context.

I suppose I can also use the llist LIFO in ep_poll_callback and
reverse that while in process context, too...

ref: http://git.lttng.org/userspace-rcu.git
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/