linux-kernel - Re: workqueue panic in 3.4 kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:41:10 +0800
From:	Lei Wen <adrian.wenl@...il.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	leiwen@...vell.com, wwang27@...vell.com
Subject: Re: workqueue panic in 3.4 kernel

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 02:01:16PM +0800, Lei Wen wrote:
>> I see...
>> How about only check those workqueue structure not on stack?
>> For current onstack usage is rare, and should be easier to check with.
>
> No, kzalloc is not required. The memory area can come from any source.
> If you're interested in improving the debug situation, please stop
> trying to do something impossible (you can't track lifetime of random
> memory area without extra bookkeeping) try to find out why debugobj
> didn't detect it (did you even enable it? either via
> CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_ENABLE_DEFAULT or "debug_objects" boot param).
>


I see...
Thanks for the detailed explanation! :)

Thanks,
Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/