linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: davinci: da850: Enable EHRPWM TBCLK from CFG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 14 Mar 2013 18:31:52 +0530
From:	Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To:	Philip Avinash <avinashphilip@...com>
CC:	<linux@....linux.org.uk>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
	<prakash.pm@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: davinci: da850: Enable EHRPWM TBCLK from CFG_CHIP1

On 3/14/2013 4:07 PM, Philip Avinash wrote:
> da850 platforms require TBCLK synchronization in CFG_CHIP1 register for
> TBCLK enable in EHRPWM modules. Enabling of TBCLK is done only if EHRPWM
> DT node status is set to "okay" DT blob.
> Also adds macro definitions for DA8XX_EHRPWM_TBCLKSYNC and
> DA8XX_CFGCHIP1_REG.

So there is actually a TBCLK in DA850 - it's just not modeled as a clock
similar to the way it is done on AM335x? If yes, then instead of adding
a dummy clock node and doing the TBCLK enable as part of init, why not
model TBCLK in clock tree even on DA850?

Thanks,
Sekhar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/