linux-kernel - Re: New MFD tree for linux-next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 16 Mar 2013 13:27:53 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: New MFD tree for linux-next

Hi Samuel,

On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:46:25 +0100 Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 01:02:01AM +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> > 
> > I am moving the MFD development from mfd-2.6.git/for-next to a new mfd-next
> > tree:
> > 
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sameo/mfd-next.git
> > 
> > Could you please point linux-next at it ? Many thanks in advance.

Done.  I assume that you are still using the for-next branch?

> I'm also carrying MFD fixes through the mfd-fixes tree:
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sameo/mfd-fixes.git
> 
> Could you please also add it to linux-next ?

What branch should I use of that?

BTW, those two trees look very similar (in fact "diff -u <(git ls-remote
mfd) <(git ls-remote mfd-fixes)" only shows a couple of differences in
all the refs).  You do realise that I can use 2 different branches of one
tree, right (as can others)?

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped