lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 16 Mar 2013 11:32:43 +0800
From:	chpoph <chpoph@...il.com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>,
	Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	will.deacon@....com
Subject: Re: udelay function delays the wrong time interval in multiprocessor
 system, if ARCH_HAS_READ_CURRENT_TIMER is not defined and on current timer is used.

On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> We don't support different CPUs running at different frequencies with
> the delay loop.  Sorry.

Does it means that a timer-based delay implementation must be used to
get an accurate delay in SMP. I think it should print a warning
message if the CPU delay loop is used in SMP.  In my system, the wrong
delay interval fluctuated with CPU frequencies caused a control
problem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ