linux-kernel - RFC (v2): Intel QST sensor driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 18 Mar 2013 21:20:53 +0000
From:	"Simon J. Rowe" <srowe@...e.org.uk>
To:	lm-sensors@...sensors.org
CC:	linux@...ck-us.net, tomas.winkler@...el.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: RFC (v2): Intel QST sensor driver

Hello,

I've made changes to my driver for the Intel Quiet System Technology
(QST) function that I posted at the end of last year and would again
appreciate feedback on it.

As before the git repo can be found here:

     http://mose.dyndns.org/mei.git

Changes from v1
---------------

The module has been re-written to be data-driven rather than use
macros. Only v1 of the protocol is implemented but adding support for
v2 only requires three arrays and nine stub functions to be defined.

The code has been compiled and tested on 3.9 rc2.

The code has been fixed up after running checkpatch.pl.

I've added documents that explain the QST protocol and also the design
of the driver.

Unchanged from v1
-----------------

The driver still uses my MEI implementation. I've taken a look at the
Intel-written driver in 3.9 and it still has no obvious way to be used
by another driver, in the same directory or otherwise. The lack of
documentation may mean I've overlooked something obvious.

The following patch is still required to prevent libsensors from
ignoring the hwmon directory

diff -ur lm_sensors-3.3.1.org/lib/sysfs.c lm_sensors-3.3.1/lib/sysfs.c
--- lm_sensors-3.3.1.org/lib/sysfs.c   2011-03-04 20:37:43.000000000 +0000
+++ lm_sensors-3.3.1/lib/sysfs.c        2012-11-14 21:48:52.144860375 +0000
@@ -701,6 +701,12 @@
                 /* As of kernel 2.6.32, the hid device names don't look 
good */
                 entry.chip.bus.nr = bus;
                 entry.chip.addr = id;
+       } else
+       if (subsys && !strcmp(subsys, "intel-mei") &&
+           sscanf(dev_name, "mei%d:%d", &bus, &fn) == 2) {
+               entry.chip.bus.type = SENSORS_BUS_TYPE_PCI;
+               entry.chip.bus.nr = bus;
+               entry.chip.addr = fn;
         } else {
                 /* Ignore unknown device */
                 err = 0;

PWM is still unimplemented.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/