linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: page_alloc: Avoid marking zones full prematurely after zone

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:33:07 +0800
From:	Simon Jeons <simon.jeons@...il.com>
To:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, Hedi Berriche <hedi@....com>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: page_alloc: Avoid marking zones full prematurely
 after zone_reclaim()

Hi Mel,
On 03/21/2013 02:19 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> The following problem was reported against a distribution kernel when
> zone_reclaim was enabled but the same problem applies to the mainline
> kernel. The reproduction case was as follows
>
> 1. Run numactl -m +0 dd if=largefile of=/dev/null
>     This allocates a large number of clean pages in node 0

I confuse why this need allocate a large number of clean pages?

>
> 2. numactl -N +0 memhog 0.5*Mg
>     This start a memory-using application in node 0.
>
> The expected behaviour is that the clean pages get reclaimed and the
> application uses node 0 for its memory. The observed behaviour was that
> the memory for the memhog application was allocated off-node since commits
> cd38b11 (mm: page allocator: initialise ZLC for first zone eligible for
> zone_reclaim) and commit 76d3fbf (mm: page allocator: reconsider zones
> for allocation after direct reclaim).
>
> The assumption of those patches was that it was always preferable to
> allocate quickly than stall for long periods of time and they were
> meant to take care that the zone was only marked full when necessary but
> an important case was missed.
>
> In the allocator fast path, only the low watermarks are checked. If the
> zones free pages are between the low and min watermark then allocations
> from the allocators slow path will succeed. However, zone_reclaim
> will only reclaim SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX or 1<<order pages. There is no
> guarantee that this will meet the low watermark causing the zone to be
> marked full prematurely.
>
> This patch will only mark the zone full after zone_reclaim if it the min
> watermarks are checked or if page reclaim failed to make sufficient
> progress.
>
> Reported-and-tested-by: Hedi Berriche <hedi@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
> ---
>   mm/page_alloc.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 8fcced7..adce823 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -1940,9 +1940,24 @@ zonelist_scan:
>   				continue;
>   			default:
>   				/* did we reclaim enough */
> -				if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, order, mark,
> +				if (zone_watermark_ok(zone, order, mark,
>   						classzone_idx, alloc_flags))
> +					goto try_this_zone;
> +
> +				/*
> +				 * Failed to reclaim enough to meet watermark.
> +				 * Only mark the zone full if checking the min
> +				 * watermark or if we failed to reclaim just
> +				 * 1<<order pages or else the page allocator
> +				 * fastpath will prematurely mark zones full
> +				 * when the watermark is between the low and
> +				 * min watermarks.
> +				 */
> +				if ((alloc_flags & ALLOC_WMARK_MIN) ||
> +				    ret == ZONE_RECLAIM_SOME)
>   					goto this_zone_full;
> +
> +				continue;
>   			}
>   		}
>   
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/