lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 21 Mar 2013 12:52:45 +0900 (JST)
From:	HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com>
To:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	vgoyal@...hat.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, cpw@....com,
	kumagai-atsushi@....nes.nec.co.jp, lisa.mitchell@...com,
	heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] kdump, vmcore: support mmap() on /proc/vmcore

From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] kdump, vmcore: support mmap() on /proc/vmcore
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 12:30:05 -0700

> On Sat, 16 Mar 2013 13:00:47 +0900 HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> 
>> Currently, read to /proc/vmcore is done by read_oldmem() that uses
>> ioremap/iounmap per a single page. For example, if memory is 1GB,
>> ioremap/iounmap is called (1GB / 4KB)-times, that is, 262144
>> times. This causes big performance degradation.
>> 
>> In particular, the current main user of this mmap() is makedumpfile,
>> which not only reads memory from /proc/vmcore but also does other
>> processing like filtering, compression and IO work. Update of page
>> table and the following TLB flush makes such processing much slow;
>> though I have yet to make patch for makedumpfile and yet to confirm
>> how it's improved.
>> 
>> To address the issue, this patch implements mmap() on /proc/vmcore to
>> improve read performance. My simple benchmark shows the improvement
>> from 200 [MiB/sec] to over 50.0 [GiB/sec].
> 
> There are quite a lot of userspace-visible vmcore changes here.  Is it
> all fully back-compatible?  Will all known userspace continue to work
> OK on newer kernels?
> 

I designed it to keep backward-compatibility at least for gdb and
binutils but not less for makedumpfile since it should follow kernel
changes; old makedumpfile cannot use newer kernels, and this is within
the range of this review.

Thanks.
HATAYAMA, Daisuke

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ