lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:45:16 +0900
From:	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>, <rjw@...k.pl>
CC:	<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>,
	<wency@...fujitsu.com>, <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ACPI,acpi_memhotplug: Remove acpi_memory_info->failed
 bit

The mail's tab become spaces. So I attached origianl patch.

Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu

2013/03/21 13:39, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> acpi_memory_info has enabled bit and failed bit for controlling memory
> hotplug. But we don't need to keep both bits.
>
> The patch removes acpi_memory_info->failed bit.
>
> Signed-off-by: yasuaki ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
>
> v2 : Changed a based kernel from linux-3.9-rc2 to linux-pm.git/bleeding-edge.
>
> ---
>   drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c |   13 +------------
>   1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
> index ea78988..597cd65 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
> @@ -73,7 +73,6 @@ struct acpi_memory_info {
>       unsigned short caching;    /* memory cache attribute */
>       unsigned short write_protect;    /* memory read/write attribute */
>       unsigned int enabled:1;
> -    unsigned int failed:1;
>   };
>
>   struct acpi_memory_device {
> @@ -201,10 +200,8 @@ static int acpi_memory_enable_device(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device)
>            * returns -EEXIST. If add_memory() returns the other error, it
>            * means that this memory block is not used by the kernel.
>            */
> -        if (result && result != -EEXIST) {
> -            info->failed = 1;
> +        if (result && result != -EEXIST)
>               continue;
> -        }
>
>           info->enabled = 1;
>
> @@ -238,15 +235,7 @@ static int acpi_memory_remove_memory(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device)
>       nid = acpi_get_node(mem_device->device->handle);
>
>       list_for_each_entry_safe(info, n, &mem_device->res_list, list) {
> -        if (info->failed)
> -            /* The kernel does not use this memory block */
> -            continue;
> -
>           if (!info->enabled)
> -            /*
> -             * The kernel uses this memory block, but it may be not
> -             * managed by us.
> -             */
>               return -EBUSY;
>
>           if (nid < 0)
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


View attachment "0002-Remove-acpi_memory_info-failed-bit.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1707 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ