| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:20:31 +0000 From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com> Subject: Re: VFS deadlock ? On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 12:12:57AM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > See the posting upthread. We could try to kludge around that as well > (e.g. have d_ancestor() compare ->d_inode instead of dentries themselves), > but I really think it's a lousy idea only inviting further abuse. > > What we should do, IMO, is to turn /proc/<pid>/net into a honest symlink - > to ../nets/<netns ID>/net. Hell, might even make it a magical symlink > instead... BTW, the root cause is that what used to be /proc/net became per-process. So Eric (IIRC) had added /proc/<pid>/net. Only they are not really per-process - they are per-netns. And instead of putting those per-ns trees elsewhere and having /proc/<pid>/net resolve to the right one, we got them as directories, with each entry hardlinked between all /proc/<pid>/net for processes from the same netns. Including the subdirectory ones. Oops... Another variant is to keep cross-hardlinks for non-directories and duplicate directory dentries/inodes as we do for /proc/<pid>/net themselves. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists