linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 0/2] PCI: Introduce MSI chip infrastructure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:30:27 +0000
From:	Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@....com>
To:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
Cc:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] PCI: Introduce MSI chip infrastructure

On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 08:51:45AM +0000, Thierry Reding wrote:
> It
> is the responsibility of the PCI host bridge driver to setup the MSI
> chip for the root bus.

I think this could work well. In the future if the use of an independent MSI
controller is required, then new DT bindings for host-bridges could use
phandles to reference independent MSI controllers as their providers of
MSIs. I guess this functionality can be built on top of what you have proposed
later as the need arises.

Andrew Murray
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/