linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] wfcqueue: functions for local append and enqueue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:31:46 +0000
From:	Eric Wong <normalperson@...t.net>
To:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
	Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wfcqueue: functions for local append and enqueue

Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com> wrote:
> * Eric Wong (normalperson@...t.net) wrote:
> >  /*
> > + * __wfcq_append_local: append one local queue to another local queue
> > + *
> > + * No memory barriers are issued.  Mutual exclusion is the responsibility
> > + * of the caller.
> > + *
> > + * Returns false if the queue was empty prior to adding the node.
> > + * Returns true otherwise.
> > + */
> > +static inline bool __wfcq_append_local(struct wfcq_head *head,
> 
> Following the rest of the header, we could use:
> 
> ___wfcq_append() for this function,

OK.

However, I think ___ is a little confusing (but I'm easily confused :x).
I didn't even realize some functions in wfcqueue.h had ___ (vs __) until
just now(!)

But I will resend later tonight/tomorrow with ___ for consistency with
the existing API unless I've convinced you "_local" is easier :)

On a related note to underscores, I totally missed the existence of
____cacheline_aligned_in_smp in my first RFC even though I had seen
the __ version for .data around.

> and:
> 
> __wfcq_enqueue()
> 
> we should also update the "Synchronization table" at the beginning of
> the file accordingly.

Will update.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/