linux-kernel - Re: FW: Regulator API ignored return values

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 22 Mar 2013 17:06:27 +0000
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>
Cc:	Kevin Liu <keyuan.liu@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>,
	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...l.ru>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FW: Regulator API ignored return values

On Friday 22 March 2013, Chris Ball wrote:
> >
> > The reason I didn't make it a fatal error is that this is just vqmmc
> > (responsible for moving from 3.3V to 1.8V for UHS modes), not the
> > main vmmc regulator.  We can just disable those UHS modes from the
> > capabilities on the host if vqmmc is missing, or failed to enable,
> > or doesn't support those voltages, and that's what the code does now.
> 
> I've pushed this patch to mmc-next for 3.10 now, let me know if you
> disagree.

No, it's fine. Sorry for not replying earlier.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/