linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 12/29] x86, tsx: Add a per thread transaction disable count

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 23 Mar 2013 17:25:58 +0100
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	x86@...nel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/29] x86, tsx: Add a per thread transaction disable
 count

On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 04:52:56PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> And wow, the XOR is *actually* faster. That's whopping three cycles on
> AMD. Similar observation on SNB.

Ok, correction: I was looking at the wrong row in the table. The XOR
version with an immediate and mem access is actually as fast as the
INC/DEC mem versions: 4 cycles on AMD F10h and 6 on SNB, according to
the docs. I should've realized that there's still a mem access there...

Anyway, the rest stands.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/