linux-kernel - Re: Generic syscall ABI support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 28 Mar 2013 11:42:47 +0000
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Ley Foon Tan <lftan@...era.com>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Generic syscall ABI support

On Thursday 28 March 2013, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 10:40 +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Thursday 28 March 2013, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
> > > We will working on generic ABI for kernel and Glibc. This might take
> > > some times.
> > 
> > Ok. Don't let that hold you up from submitting the kernel patches
> > for review though.
>
> Do you mean we can submit the patches for review before we got the
> generic ABI support?

I mean you can send the other patches for review already. Changing
your implementtion to use the generic ABI will basically just mean
not sending the patches tht implement your own ABI, so that's not
hard. Of course until you also have a new glibc port, you won't be
able to test that it actually works, but that is not essential for
the reviewing stage.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/